1031taxreform.com

A Section 1031 like-kind exchange reform resource

  • Economic Studies
    • Updated 2020 Ling & Petrova Microeconomic Impact Study
    • EY Macroeconomic Study Overview
      • Ernst & Young Macroeconomic Study Speaker Biographies
      • Ernst & Young Macroeconomic Study Press Releases
      • Ernst & Young Macroeconomic Study Sponsors
    • Ling and Petrova Microeconomic Study Overview
      • FEA Ling and Petrova Press Release
      • Ling and Petrova Microeconomic Study Authors
    • NAR LKE Survey 2015
    • Contact Us: Section 1031 Economic Studies
  • Issues
    • Current Repeal Proposals
      • House of Representatives
      • Senate
      • White House – Treasury
      • Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT)
    • Like-Kind Exchanges Needed with Expensing
    • Legislative History
  • Resources
    • FEA Library
    • Resources for Supporters
    • Testimonials
    • Supportive Organizations
    • FAQs
  • News
    • §1031 In The Press
    • FEA §1031 Activity
    • Partner §1031 Activity
    • Submit a News Article
    • Press Room
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • 1031.org

FEA Ling and Petrova Press Release

Study Shows Like-Kind Exchanges Increase Real Estate Investment, Capital Improvements and Jobs

Repeal of Section 1031 Would Disrupt Local Property Markets, Slow Economic Growth, and Harm Tenants and Owners

Return to the Ling and Petrova Microeconomic Study Overview.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 13, 2015

CONTACT: Suzanne Goldstein Baker
PHONE: 312-223-3003

Ankeny, IA — The Federation of Exchange Accommodators (FEA) is pleased to announce that a study released by the Real Estate Like-Kind Exchange Coalition, of which the FEA is a member, finds the cost of Internal Revenue Code §1031, known as like-kind exchanges, is largely overestimated while benefits of the provision are undervalued. The study concludes that the real estate industry benefits greatly from like-kind exchanges through increased investment, reduced leverage, shorter holding periods and improved liquidity.

I.R.C. §1031 allows for the deferral of capital gains tax and ordinary income tax on business or investment use property if the property is exchanged for like-kind business or investment use property. The study concludes that the provision encourages business owners to reinvest their cash flow into their businesses, which in turn encourages U.S. job creation and stimulates economic growth. Like kind exchanges are used in a variety of industries in addition to real estate.

The study was commissioned in response to legislative proposals to repeal Section 1031 and conducted by Professors David C. Ling (University of Florida) and Milena Petrova (Syracuse University). The study reports widespread use of §1031 in the real estate market, and after reviewing more than 1.6 million real estate transactions over a 17-year period, concludes that like-kind exchanges not only contribute to an increase in investment, but also to overall taxes paid.

The study finds that repeal or curtailment of §1031 would result in a decrease in real estate prices, an increase in rent for tenants in the long term, and an overall decrease in real estate investment. Other negative impacts include longer holding periods which leads to less transactional activity and greater reliance on the use of debt rather than equity. The effects of a repeal would harm tenants and real estate owners, local property markets and the overall economy.

The study debunks the popular misconception that like-kind exchanges are used to indefinitely avoid capital gain and depreciation recapture taxes. The researchers found that in 88% of the real estate like-kind exchanges studied, investors disposed of the exchanged replacement property through a taxable sale, rather than through a second exchange. On average, these subsequent sales of exchanged replacement properties resulted in a 19% percent higher tax liability compared to the sale of a property acquired after an ordinary sale, ultimately generating greater tax revenue.

“This study demonstrates that in the case of real estate exchanges, taxes are ultimately paid to the Treasury, and at the same time, exchange transactions boost investment and create a healthy economic environment for the real estate market” said Mary Cunningham, President of the Federation of Exchange Accommodators, a member of The Real Estate Like-Kind Exchange Coalition. She noted that the study found that like-kind exchanges are associated with an average replacement property investment that is 33% higher than in a non-exchanged property.

The commercial real estate impact study dovetails with a macro-economic study of §1031 repeal released by Ernst & Young LLP in March 2015. The Ernst & Young study also found the cost of like-kind exchanges to the Treasury is likely overstated since government estimates of the tax cost do not account for the effect of a repeal on ancillary businesses and the broader economy. The authors of both studies concluded that the true cost of like kind exchanges is a mere fraction of government estimates in the long run.

The full study can be found here.

Download this document as a PDF here.

###

The Coalition is comprised of more than a dozen industry associations whose members represent a diverse group of U.S. business owners and individuals.

FEA_logo

Section 1031 Complements Tax Reform, Adds to Growth

IRC Section 1031 like-kind exchanges help a taxpayers at all levels expand their businesses and invest for the future, with a significant positive impact on economic growth. Like-kind exchanges are used widely in the real estate, transportation, agriculture, conservation, equipment leasing, rental vehicle and construction industries. Section 1031 contributes significantly to American jobs, investment, tax revenue, and the health of the U.S. economy.

Section 1031 complements expected tax reform proposals, such as the House Republican Blueprint, and should be retained in its present form. Economic studies found that limiting or repealing like-kind exchanges would result in economic contraction and job loss.

About LKEs

Like-kind exchanges swap property, defer tax, and allow businesses and investors to manage capital. Taxes are eventually paid.

Benefits

Like-kind exchanges promote growth in local communities, federal revenue, and the U.S. economy.

Repeal Issues

Repeal legislation would cause damage to the economy, hurting investors, retirees, renters and other groups.

Economic Studies

Recent analyses of millions of real estate transactions show widespread use of like-kind exchanges by a broad base of taxpayers.

Resources

Find informational handouts and videos in Supporter Resources.
Or, look through our library of official letters and whitepapers.

Take Action

Members of Congress depend on stories from their constituents. Tell your legislators about how like-kind exchanges have worked for you.

Federation of Exchange Accommodators
Lynn Harkin, CAE, Executive Director
Federation of Exchange Accommodators
1255 SW Prairie Trail Parkway
Ankeny, IA 50023
Email: director@1031.org
Phone: 515-244-6515
Fax: 515-334-1174
www.1031.org

Williams & Jensen
701 8th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-659-8201
Fax: 202-659-5249
www.williamsandjensen.com

Copyright © 2021